Saturday, March 14, 2009
Who's responsible
Who is responsible when an pet has a curable condition and the owner does not have the money to pay for care? Is the owner ethically obligated to pay for care even if it damages them financially? Is the veterinary community or individual veterinarian offering care responsiblefor making the cure affordable? Is society responsible in any way? Does it make a difference if the condition is manageable but not curable?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment